<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Molly's Monday Machination - An AFL Podcast - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-ccbb0d2d" type="application/json"/><link>http://mmmaflpodcast.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 20:12:49 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: AFL NAB Draft 2009 - Round 6 and 7</title><link>http://afl.mollyzine.com/2008/11/29/afl-nab-draft-2009-round-6-and-7/#comment-4392648</link><description>why did  essendon pass in the round 6</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brenden</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 20:12:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AFL NAB Draft 2009 - Round 6 and 7</title><link>http://afl.mollyzine.com/2008/11/29/afl-nab-draft-2009-round-6-and-7/#comment-4392979</link><description>They would be looking to leave their options open for the preseason&lt;br&gt;draft, possibly pick up a mature age player.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mollyfud</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 19:46:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MMM - Video Edition - Episode1 - Ben Cousins, Roos and Carlton men</title><link>http://afl.mollyzine.com/2007/11/07/mmm-video-edition-episode1-ben-cousins-roos-and-carlton-men/#comment-4068195</link><description>It is a sad story and the fact that Ben did shaved down whether to avoid the&lt;br&gt;test, to have ago at the AFL or for cosmetic reasons, it was a terrible look&lt;br&gt;with this test coming up. In some ways the AFL can take the positive out of&lt;br&gt;this now and put rules in place that will stop players doing this to avoid&lt;br&gt;the test.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I personally think it would be good for some club to give him a go but it is&lt;br&gt;now seeming unlikely to happen. Perhaps some daring/smart club needs to&lt;br&gt;approach the AFL about getting special leave to add Ben to there Rookie list&lt;br&gt;in the same way Tom Lonergan and Adam Ramanauskas did. I mean it is&lt;br&gt;considered a medical problem that Ben has and the AD has been saying how&lt;br&gt;footy is important to his recovery. Just an out of left field idea.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Molly</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mollyfud</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 04:48:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MMM - Video Edition - Episode1 - Ben Cousins, Roos and Carlton men</title><link>http://afl.mollyzine.com/2007/11/07/mmm-video-edition-episode1-ben-cousins-roos-and-carlton-men/#comment-4067087</link><description>Poor Ben Cousins.  He's still not completely out of the woods.  This 'Mollyzine' edition is over a year ago and you mention Ben avoiding drug tests.  A year later and he recently removed hair from his body to evade an AFL 'hair' drug test which apparently reveals drug use in the previous three months.  Great footballer but still has some issues!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben Cousins News</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 00:35:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trade Week 2006 - Tuesday - Aka is a Dog</title><link>http://afl.mollyzine.com/2006/10/09/trade-week-2006-tuesday-aka-is-a-dog/#comment-3576567</link><description>Cameron Faulkner and Shane &lt;br&gt;Birss offered by Bulldogs&lt;br&gt;given details  about the  dogs</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hund</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 16:55:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: Where will Ryan O&amp;#8217;Keefe end up?</title><link>http://afl.mollyzine.com/2008/10/07/poll-where-will-ryan-okeefe-end-up/#comment-2998376</link><description>didnt know u had ur own site molly, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;i'm thinkin carlton will take him in the PSD</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">XztatiK</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 11:14:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: Where will Ryan O&amp;#8217;Keefe end up?</title><link>http://afl.mollyzine.com/2008/10/07/poll-where-will-ryan-okeefe-end-up/#comment-2902409</link><description>Yep, agree. I am really interested why the Hawks would be so&lt;br&gt;interested. It doesn't seem to fit too me but its true. Wonder if they&lt;br&gt;are just after a huge bargain!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mollyfud</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:13:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: Where will Ryan O&amp;#8217;Keefe end up?</title><link>http://afl.mollyzine.com/2008/10/07/poll-where-will-ryan-okeefe-end-up/#comment-2902295</link><description>Think he will stay in Sydney but maybe Essendon could be an option with Essendon giving Lovett and a draft pick in exchange.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kick2Kick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:00:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Swan heading south for next Winter? Could Magpie head north?</title><link>http://afl.mollyzine.com/2008/09/30/swan-heading-south-for-next-winter-could-magpie-head-north/#comment-2744684</link><description>Yeah, not sure of the validity of the rumor but I think the idea of a&lt;br&gt;swap is an interesting one. The real meat of my post is the fact who&lt;br&gt;ever plays the hardest hardball will win and get the deal they want.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mollyfud</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 23:48:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Swan heading south for next Winter? Could Magpie head north?</title><link>http://afl.mollyzine.com/2008/09/30/swan-heading-south-for-next-winter-could-magpie-head-north/#comment-2742704</link><description>Yeah I dont know...&lt;br&gt;Who takes what any Cornes person takes as truth??</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kick2Kick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 20:31:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Video - Hawks sing their Song after the Grand Final</title><link>http://afl.mollyzine.com/2008/09/29/video-hawks-sing-their-song-after-the-grand-final/#comment-2740333</link><description>No. If I wasn't there, I would still be suprised</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mollyfud</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:16:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Video - Hawks sing their Song after the Grand Final</title><link>http://afl.mollyzine.com/2008/09/29/video-hawks-sing-their-song-after-the-grand-final/#comment-2738188</link><description>Awesome Molly, thanks for posting it .... god damn can you believe we won it. I've been pinching myself ever since. Love me boys!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zenmaster Fu</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 15:05:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Video - Hawks sing their Song after the Grand Final</title><link>http://afl.mollyzine.com/2008/09/29/video-hawks-sing-their-song-after-the-grand-final/#comment-2721651</link><description>Yep, thank God for the Internet! Thanks AL Gore! ;-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mollyfud</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 22:17:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Video - Hawks sing their Song after the Grand Final</title><link>http://afl.mollyzine.com/2008/09/29/video-hawks-sing-their-song-after-the-grand-final/#comment-2721099</link><description>It was pretty poor form indeed but its not the first time channel 7 has screwed up and it wont be the last either :roll:</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kick2Kick</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 22:13:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: Geelong vs Western Bulldogs</title><link>http://afl.mollyzine.com/2008/07/16/poll-geelong-vs-western-bulldogs/#comment-2393473</link><description>i reckon that the western bulldogs will win this weekend because we aare guns!!! yay</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LEGENDS</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 22:14:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MMM - ShawDakGate, Collingwood and Eddie</title><link>http://afl.mollyzine.com/2008/08/06/mmm-shawdakgate-collingwood-and-eddie/#comment-1155617</link><description>Thanks J. &lt;br&gt;Yeah, I understand the thoughts on the level of issue that they caused and I&lt;br&gt;agree Didak probably wasn't that bad but the thing is he did end up lying to&lt;br&gt;the club and he may have been out when, with his history, he shouldn't be.&lt;br&gt;So if he hadn't of lied, he probably doesn't need to be traded but once he&lt;br&gt;lied, how can the club trust him going forward and how can they resolve this&lt;br&gt;with the comments of last year (last chance) and the comments last Monday&lt;br&gt;about "getting rid of mates like that"? It just keeps making the club look&lt;br&gt;worst and worst. I guess the club might be seeing how the mood of the public&lt;br&gt;goes from here till the end of the year before deciding if they need to&lt;br&gt;trade him. They just look very week in my opinion.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mollyfud</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 00:52:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MMM - ShawDakGate, Collingwood and Eddie</title><link>http://afl.mollyzine.com/2008/08/06/mmm-shawdakgate-collingwood-and-eddie/#comment-1155594</link><description>Luv the Pies, these guys are meatheads... they really should go! &lt;br&gt;But what if Didak was caught pissing on a shop window when maggot drunk?&lt;br&gt;He is no different to Fev... except he shuts his mouth when in shame! There are a lot of idiots out there, these guys just have freaky skills and are watched more closely! If we could get someone as good... trade 'em, if not keep 'em!&lt;br&gt;Is there any truth that Johnathon Brown was about to sign with pies and put his pen down when all this shit went down?&lt;br&gt;J</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">j</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 00:45:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Since when do we trust Jurno&amp;rsquo;s before Jeff.</title><link>http://afl.mollyzine.com/2008/07/31/since-when-do-we-trust-jurnos-before-jeff/#comment-1131897</link><description>Cool</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mollyfud</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 03:47:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Since when do we trust Jurno&amp;rsquo;s before Jeff.</title><link>http://afl.mollyzine.com/2008/07/31/since-when-do-we-trust-jurnos-before-jeff/#comment-1131598</link><description>Perhaps we'll leave it at that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Greg</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 02:30:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Since when do we trust Jurno&amp;rsquo;s before Jeff.</title><link>http://afl.mollyzine.com/2008/07/31/since-when-do-we-trust-jurnos-before-jeff/#comment-1131341</link><description>Hmmm... No.&lt;br&gt;The first 2 points are pretty true. The 3rd isn't. They should be widely&lt;br&gt;slammed for their views and taken through the legal processes that are&lt;br&gt;appropriate. I have no defense for Boonie Doon in this but I agree that they&lt;br&gt;have to do what they "feel" is right as its their heads on the line.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nothing to do with this situation or supporting Boonie Doon, but I am a&lt;br&gt;believer that if your in charge of something you should do it your way (to&lt;br&gt;as much as you have control over) as if it goes wrong you have no one to&lt;br&gt;blame but your self.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now applying that thought to Boonie Doon, If they feel the risk they should&lt;br&gt;sack the guy but they should understand the legal trouble they are getting&lt;br&gt;themselves into and be prepared to where that for THEIR beliefs!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mollyfud</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 01:27:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Since when do we trust Jurno&amp;rsquo;s before Jeff.</title><link>http://afl.mollyzine.com/2008/07/31/since-when-do-we-trust-jurnos-before-jeff/#comment-1131296</link><description>True - I would sack them. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course, my "feelings" would be based on reason and evidence, not just a premonition or a bad dream or ingrained bigotry.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;From your responses you seem to be saying that:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) The Bonny Doon football club has no reasonable basis for its suspicions that there's an unacceptable risk in hiring a bi trainer. It's just pure bigotry.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2) However, having formed that (erroneous) view, they are required to sack him because they have a duty of care.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3) While this is discrimination, people who advocate or express this view shouldn't be criticised.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is that pretty much it?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Greg</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 01:17:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Since when do we trust Jurno&amp;rsquo;s before Jeff.</title><link>http://afl.mollyzine.com/2008/07/31/since-when-do-we-trust-jurnos-before-jeff/#comment-1131206</link><description>Wow. Tough questions and I will have a go at answering them, as long as you&lt;br&gt;reply by answering them honestly. &lt;br&gt;"There is no more or less risk of abuse or predatory behavior hiring a bi&lt;br&gt;trainer than a straight one." True&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"While the risk is higher, it's still acceptable." NA &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"The risk is higher and unacceptable." NA&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"The Bonny Doon Football club is required to sack the trainer once they form&lt;br&gt;the view the risk is unacceptable." True&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"The club is allowed to sack the trainer once they form that view." False&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"If someone feels - rightly or wrongly - that Asians are too likely to&lt;br&gt;steal, they don't have to employ them." False &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now I have answered them according to the words you used. For example the&lt;br&gt;second last question seems to ask me to comment on the legality of the&lt;br&gt;actions of the club. I think they're illegal/discriminatory (but the&lt;br&gt;law/appropriate authority will decide that). The last question again seems&lt;br&gt;like it has a legal aspect. If the only reason they aren't hiring them is&lt;br&gt;that they're Asian, then that would be discriminatory/illegal as well. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So how would you answer the questions. And let me add this statement:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"If I was hiring a house cleaner and I got the feeling that there was an&lt;br&gt;unacceptable risk of them stealing from my house, even if they had years of&lt;br&gt;good references, I wouldn't hire them" &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Molly&lt;br&gt;PS. I am assuming your getting these comment replies via your email. Don't&lt;br&gt;you love this comment system?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mollyfud</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 01:02:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Since when do we trust Jurno&amp;rsquo;s before Jeff.</title><link>http://afl.mollyzine.com/2008/07/31/since-when-do-we-trust-jurnos-before-jeff/#comment-1131119</link><description>Look, I don't hate Jeff. I made that clear early on. I am disappointed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't think you're helping yourself by saying "lot's of people have this position, so it must be right". A hell of a lot more people barrack for Collingwood than Hawthorn - so why don't you join up? Or become a Hindu, for that matter. See, because it's stupid to base arguments on popularity.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Forget Kennett and the media, I'm interested in what you personally think about this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just mark a True or False next to these statements:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"There is no more or less risk of abuse or predatory behaviour hiring a bi trainer than a straight one."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"While the risk is higher, it's still acceptable."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"The risk is higher and unacceptable."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"The Bonny Doon Football club is required to sack the trainer once they form the view the risk is unacceptable."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"The club is allowed to sack the trainer once they form that view."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"If someone feels - rightly or wrongly - that Asians are too likely to steal, they don't have to employ them."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nail your colours to the mast.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Greg</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:43:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Since when do we trust Jurno&amp;rsquo;s before Jeff.</title><link>http://afl.mollyzine.com/2008/07/31/since-when-do-we-trust-jurnos-before-jeff/#comment-1131001</link><description>Good try dude.&lt;br&gt;If you want to hate on Jeff, thats your choice. If you found those sites,&lt;br&gt;you know its crap that I haven't explained the who situation and all the&lt;br&gt;issues.  I am not going to go through it hear, because basically the court&lt;br&gt;of popular opinion agrees with me in there lack of interest on this issue!&lt;br&gt;I am moving on.&lt;br&gt;So who do you think is going to win this week, Saints or the Sinners&lt;br&gt;(Collingwood)?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mollyfud</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:22:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Since when do we trust Jurno&amp;rsquo;s before Jeff.</title><link>http://afl.mollyzine.com/2008/07/31/since-when-do-we-trust-jurnos-before-jeff/#comment-1130910</link><description>It seems you're going with Option 4 - Kennett personally doesn't see any extra risk in having a trainer who is bi, but he respects the right of the Bonny Doon footy club to believe there is an elevated risk and that the club is therefore entirely justified in sacking him.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well, that's a crock. If true, he should condemn the hicks publicly, and the club should be widely criticised and possibly sued for discrimination and unlawful dismissal. Sponsorship should be pulled and any government support or money removed from the club and any sponsors who fail to remove their support.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By your logic, if some racists somewhere reckon that Asians are more likely to steal, then they're acting on a "duty of care" to stop employing them. That is just wrong.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I note that you are the only person who is going "Nah, nah, that's not what Jeff really meant!" when everyone else is on the same page.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I note that you have refused to provide a plausible alternative interpretation for Kennett's remarks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also note that you have failed to give any possible "context" that could allow a reasonable person to re-interpret the facts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lastly, I see you've been spreading yourself around on the gay sites too:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://mcv.e-p.net.au/news/no-apology-from-kennett-3712.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://mcv.e-p.net.au/news/no-apology-from-kenn...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When taken with your earlier defence of Buddy Franklin, it's clear you're hero worship of the Hawthorn Football Club has blinded you to common sense.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank god you don't barrack for Collingwood, otherwise you'd be combing the streets of Kew, day and night, looking for that possum and carrying on about whether or not the CIA has spy satellite footage of Didak getting into the car immediately after the crash.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Greg</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:09:45 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>