Hello! Molly's Monday Machination - An AFL Podcast is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.
Community Page
- afl.mollyzine.com Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- why did essendon pass in the round 6
- They would be looking to leave their options open for the preseason draft, possibly pick up a mature age player.
- It is a sad story and the fact that Ben did shaved down whether to avoid the test, to have ago at the AFL or for cosmetic reasons, it was a terrible look with this test coming up. In some ways the...
- Poor Ben Cousins. He's still not completely out of the woods. This 'Mollyzine' edition is over a year ago and you mention Ben avoiding drug tests. A year later and he recently removed...
- Cameron Faulkner and Shane Birss offered by Bulldogs given details about the dogs
Jump to original thread »
Podcast Video: Download
On todays show:
Results of the Queens Birthday clash between Melbourne and Collingwood
Match Review Panel findings
Adam Goodes decision
Dream team results
Don’t forget the coaches Box and the DT Talk Party (http://dreamteamtalk.com/2008/06/02/dt-talk-par...)
Molly<br ... Continue reading »
On todays show:
Results of the Queens Birthday clash between Melbourne and Collingwood
Match Review Panel findings
Adam Goodes decision
Dream team results
Don’t forget the coaches Box and the DT Talk Party (http://dreamteamtalk.com/2008/06/02/dt-talk-par...)
Molly<br ... Continue reading »
1 year ago
1 year ago
Thanks for the comment. Yeah it was a bit but its only slightly off what the
others were. It really hangs on reckless compared negligent. I don't think
the impact (from what I saw) could be anything more then low. So to look at
it compared to the other ones, this needs to be kept in mind. To be fair and
will look harder at this for the podcast this week, Murphy and Burgoyne
where the same negligent but were graded as medium impact not low. I think
Burton was Reckless but low impact. So it was around the same for all.
Others had bad records that didn't help. Goodes record isn't great, but he
has avoided weeks (probably wrongly) in the past and that means in this
system his record is neither good or bad.
Stay tuned for more on this.
Molly
1 year ago
I will comment more on your new post
1 year ago