http://mmmaflpodcast.disqus.com/enTue, 10 Jun 2008 21:53:04 -0000http://afl.mollyzine.com/2008/06/10/mmm-video-edition-queens-birthday-monday-result-mrp-and-dt/#comment-634364Looking forward to it!mollyfudTue, 10 Jun 2008 21:53:04 -0000http://afl.mollyzine.com/2008/06/10/mmm-video-edition-queens-birthday-monday-result-mrp-and-dt/#comment-633841Still wrong and Lethal is right, he is a protected species..<br><br>I will comment more on your new postKick2KickTue, 10 Jun 2008 20:05:01 -0000http://afl.mollyzine.com/2008/06/10/mmm-video-edition-queens-birthday-monday-result-mrp-and-dt/#comment-626186Hey K2K, <br>Thanks for the comment. Yeah it was a bit but its only slightly off what the<br>others were. It really hangs on reckless compared negligent. I don't think<br>the impact (from what I saw) could be anything more then low. So to look at<br>it compared to the other ones, this needs to be kept in mind. To be fair and<br>will look harder at this for the podcast this week, Murphy and Burgoyne<br>where the same negligent but were graded as medium impact not low. I think<br>Burton was Reckless but low impact. So it was around the same for all.<br>Others had bad records that didn't help. Goodes record isn't great, but he<br>has avoided weeks (probably wrongly) in the past and that means in this<br>system his record is neither good or bad.<br><br>Stay tuned for more on this.<br>MollymollyfudMon, 09 Jun 2008 20:40:04 -0000http://afl.mollyzine.com/2008/06/10/mmm-video-edition-queens-birthday-monday-result-mrp-and-dt/#comment-626143Goodes getting off was such a back flip from the past two weeks. AFL again is inconsistent!Kick2KickMon, 09 Jun 2008 20:33:13 -0000