http://mmmaflpodcast.disqus.com/enWed, 16 Jul 2008 03:54:08 -0000http://afl.mollyzine.com/2008/07/15/tribunal-solomon-gets-8/#comment-906682The Bucanan was consistent again. His was high (or medium) impact and<br>reckless (or intentional) when the other incidents where only negligent. He<br>had 10% loading and a virtual 1 game suspended (from memory). I think the<br>Pratt case doesn't show a problem with the system but actually is a perfect<br>example of how the system is working! The Match Review Panel (MRP) should be<br>making there decisions on the video and evidence they have. They got it<br>right on the evidence they had. Pratt and North choose to challenge and the<br>evidence they put forward obviously showed that there was nothing in it.<br>This is how the system should work!<br>Just my 2 cents.mollyfudWed, 16 Jul 2008 03:54:08 -0000http://afl.mollyzine.com/2008/07/15/tribunal-solomon-gets-8/#comment-906636yes I do agree it is more consistent but from reports Bucanns was a bit of a joke. and how can you get three weeks for a hand on the face and then get off??Kick2KickWed, 16 Jul 2008 03:47:08 -0000http://afl.mollyzine.com/2008/07/15/tribunal-solomon-gets-8/#comment-894910Hmmm... I have no problem with this one. Hall should have got more. The<br>system is consistent and it is consistent again! When we had the old system,<br>people wanted consistency! This system is consistent. It takes into account<br>record and the likes and you know what your walking into. Both were stupid<br>and dangerous. The funny thing is that Hall is on sideline as well.mollyfudTue, 15 Jul 2008 08:53:04 -0000http://afl.mollyzine.com/2008/07/15/tribunal-solomon-gets-8/#comment-894896What a joke.....<br><br>Barry Halls was worse, much worse at least this was in play sort of unlike HallsKick2KickTue, 15 Jul 2008 08:48:09 -0000